On February 12, 2026, @batef4380 opened a slash against @beaverd on Ethos for 203 credibility score. The slash was titled “X’s $1M winner exposed as serial rugger.”
At the time, Beaver’s credibility score was already rated “Questionable” because of negative reviews on the network. The slash added a formal accusation on top of that existing record.
What the slash claimed
The title of the slash summarized @batef4380’s accusation in two parts:
- “X’s $1M winner”: how the slash described @beaverd
- “Exposed as serial rugger”: the charge against them, that they had repeatedly rugged
Ethos shared the case publicly and linked to the full slash, which can be read at app.ethos.network/activity/slash/374. The Ethos posts did not go into the evidence beyond the title, so the details of the case are on the slash page itself.
A score that was already questionable
Ethos is an onchain reputation network where people review and vouch for each other, and every account gets a credibility score based on what others say about it. That score reflects the record other people have built up about an account over time.
In @beaverd’s case, Ethos noted that the score was already sitting at “Questionable” before the slash, as a result of negative reviews. Put together, the two signals tell a reader more than either one alone: reviewers had raised concerns about the account, and then another user formally accused it of serial rugging.
That contrast is part of what made the case notable. A headline like “$1M winner” suggests success and visibility. The reviews and the slash on Ethos pointed to a very different reputation.
How it ended
The Ethos posts from February 12, 2026, announced the slash and linked to it, but they do not record its outcome. Anyone looking for how the case was resolved can check the slash page linked above.
This thread first appeared on X.
