On August 21, 2025, @AKolomejcenko opened a slash on Ethos against @campnetworkxyz, the account for Camp Network, for 203 credibility score. They titled the case “SCAMp Network.”

A slash puts a specific accusation in front of the Ethos community, which can weigh the case. This one centered on Camp Network’s airdrop: how users registered for it, what they were asked to provide, and whether the product worked.

Who was involved

Ethos labeled the two accounts by standing when it shared the slash:

• @AKolomejcenko: established
• @campnetworkxyz: known

Ethos is an onchain reputation network where people review and vouch for each other, and every account gets a credibility score from what others say about it. A slash targets that score directly, in this case for 203 points.

The case against Camp Network

@AKolomejcenko called Camp Network “another scam project” and listed their reasons:

• Mandatory KYC: users had to complete Know Your Customer checks to receive the airdrop.
• A $10 ETH requirement: users needed $10 worth of mainnet ETH in their claim wallet to register, even though registration was a gasless transaction. @AKolomejcenko questioned why the funds were needed at all.
• A short registration window: registration for the airdrop was set to end on August 26, 2025, which by their count left about four to five days to register and claim.
• A product that didn’t work: they described it as constantly malfunctioning and said they couldn’t complete the third part of the tasks because nothing worked.
• Uncounted activity: on August 21, 2025, users could still collect matches, and a checker was released the same day. According to @AKolomejcenko, those matches obviously weren’t accounted for.

They closed by saying that all of this, “and much more,” suggested the project was simply scamming its users.

Why the details mattered

The complaints were concrete rather than general. Each point described a requirement or experience that other airdrop participants could check against their own: whether they were asked for KYC, whether they had to hold ETH to register, whether the tasks worked, and whether their activity showed up in the checker.

That is the kind of case a slash is built for. Instead of one user’s frustration staying in a single post, the accusation sat on Ethos where others could see it and judge whether it held up.

The outcome

The posts announcing the slash don’t record how it ended, including whether the community upheld it or how Camp Network’s credibility score changed as a result.

This thread first appeared on X.