On February 19, 2026, @noheartlessss opened a slash on Ethos against @travisbickle0x for 214 credibility score, accusing them of a deliberate scheme to extract funds from Fantasy Top. By the next day, four slashes were live against accounts connected to the project, with over 8k credibility score at stake.

The episode shows how reputation on Ethos can be challenged in public. Ethos is an onchain reputation network where people review and vouch for each other, and every account gets a credibility score from what others say about it. A slash puts part of that score at stake, with the case laid out for others to weigh.

The first slash: @travisbickle0x

The first slash came from @noheartlessss. Their case argued that what happened was not bad luck but intent:

“this isn’t a mere string of unfortunate coincidences, but a deliberate scheme to extract funds under the pretext of separating the ‘company’ treasury from the game’s treasury”

The claim centers on the split between two pools of money: a “company” treasury and the game’s treasury. According to @noheartlessss, that separation served as a pretext for taking funds. Ethos shared the case and asked the community what it thought.

Sentiment on Fantasy Top’s listing

The same day, Ethos noted where sentiment stood on Fantasy Top’s Listing: 17% bullish on the month. Even so, some people were still signaling support. Ethos pointed to @0xAbhiP and @PedroFounder as among those indicating they remained bullish.

That left a split picture: a serious accusation against an account tied to the project, low overall sentiment on its listing, and a handful of people still backing it.

Four slashes by February 20

On February 20, 2026, Ethos reported that four slashes were live as the whole @fantasy_top_ was being held accountable. The accounts being slashed were:

• @travisbickle0x
• @0xMikado
• @710_eth
• @0xKipit

Together, more than 8k credibility score was at stake if the slashes went through.

Moving from one slash to four changed the scope of the case. What began as an accusation against a single account became a broader challenge to the people connected to the project.

How it ended

The posts don’t record the outcome of any of the four slashes, or whether any of the credibility score at stake was ultimately removed. They capture the moment the cases were opened: a specific allegation about how Fantasy Top’s treasuries were handled, put in front of the Ethos community to judge.

This story first appeared on X.