On January 2, 2026, @hrithikk opened a slash against @predictdotfun on Ethos, putting 250 credibility score on the line. The accusation was short: “predict . fun changed market resolution to scam.”

Ethos flagged the slash publicly and asked a direct question: did @predictdotfun step out of line?

What the slash alleged

@hrithikk’s claim centered on market resolution. According to @hrithikk, predict.fun changed how a market resolved, and they described that change as a scam.

For anyone who uses prediction markets, resolution is the moment that matters most. It decides which side of a market was right. An accusation that a platform changed a resolution goes to the core of whether users can trust the outcomes it reports.

The post didn’t say which market was involved or give further detail about the change. What it recorded was the accusation itself and the size of the slash.

Why a slash matters on Ethos

Ethos is an onchain reputation network where people review and vouch for each other, and every account gets a credibility score from what others say about it. A slash is a formal accusation against an account, and this one targeted 250 points of @predictdotfun’s credibility score.

That makes the dispute more than a complaint posted on X. It placed a specific allegation against a specific account on the record, tied to its reputation on the network.

The question Ethos asked

Ethos framed the case as an open question to its community: did @predictdotfun step out of line here? The answer depended on whether people found @hrithikk’s claim about the changed market resolution convincing.

How it ended

The Ethos post doesn’t record the outcome of the slash. It captured the accusation as it stood on January 2, 2026: @hrithikk alleging that predict.fun changed a market resolution to scam, and 250 credibility score at stake.

This post first appeared on X.